# Contact | RankShield Financial

> Talk to RankShield Financial about pre-settlement payment verification. Tell us your rails, your volume, and what you need to prove before money moves.
>
> Source: https://rankshieldfinancial.com/contact/ · RankShield Financial (verifiable pre-settlement payment security)

RankShield Network · Financial
# Request access to RankShield Financial. tell us how you move money. **Request access** is how you get in touch with RankShield Financial today — a verifiable, pre-settlement payment security platform rolling out with design partners on instant and tokenized rails. Tell us how you move money and we’ll map it to your settlement flow. There’s no live rail integration yet, so we onboard partners deliberately.
  design-partner rollout  no live rail yet  no custody of funds        request access    What happens next
- Your request is emailed straight to our team the moment you submit — a real person reads every one.
- We read every request and reply personally to map RankShield Financial to your settlement flow.
- If it’s a fit, we onboard you as a design partner — remember, there’s no live rail integration yet.

Want the background first? Read [about RankShield Financial](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/about/) — why it exists and the honesty doctrine behind it.
       01  // Who it’s for  Who requests access
## Who is RankShield Financial for?

RankShield Financial is for any organization that moves money on rails that settle with finality and cannot be reversed, and that would rather verify a payment’s intent before settlement than chase it afterward. That spans banks and credit unions on instant rails, fintechs and payment service providers embedding verification into their own flows, stablecoin issuers and crypto custodians on regulated and on-chain rails, corporate treasury teams defending high-value transfers, and marketplaces and platforms disbursing to many counterparties. If an authorized AI agent initiates spend on your behalf, or a coached-victim scam can push an irreversible transfer, you are exactly who the design-partner program is built to onboard. The common thread is not an industry label — it is finality. Wherever value moves and cannot be pulled back, a released, held, or denied verdict at the authorization step is worth more than any after-the-fact review.

### [Banks and credit unions](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/solutions/banks/)
 rtp · fednow
Verify instant-rail intent inside your own authorization path and keep signed evidence for exams — without taking custody of member funds.

### [Fintechs and PSPs](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/solutions/fintechs-and-psps/)
 embedded verification
Embed pre-settlement verification into the flow you already operate, so a released, held, or denied verdict fires before value reaches the rail.

### [Stablecoin issuers](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/solutions/stablecoin-issuers/)
 genius act era
Attach verifiable intent verification to regulated stablecoin movement and produce evidence to support compliance as the rules tighten.

### [Crypto custodians](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/solutions/crypto-custodians/)
 on-chain finality
Gate irreversible on-chain settlement with a signed, quantum-safe verdict, and reconcile settlement against what was actually attested.

### [Corporate treasury](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/solutions/corporate-treasury/)
 high-value transfers
Defend high-value wires and instant transfers against CEO-fraud and coached-victim scams with a pre-settlement gate, not a post-hoc score.

### [Marketplaces and platforms](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/solutions/marketplaces-and-platforms/)
 many counterparties
Verify intent across many disbursements and constrain autonomous payment agents with signed spend constitutions and a dead-man heartbeat.
        02  // After you request access  The onboarding walk-through
## What happens after you request access?

After you request access, the process is deliberately human, because there is no live rail integration yet and we onboard design partners one settlement flow at a time. Submitting the form sends your request straight to our team by email; no account is created and nothing is stored in a product database. A real person reads it and replies. From there, the path is a short, honest sequence rather than an automated funnel.

- **You send the request.** Your name, work email, company, role, rails of interest, and a short note on how you move money are emailed to our team. That is the entire intake — no account is created, and nothing is stored in a product database.
- **We read it and reply personally.** We confirm we received it and ask the few questions we need to understand your settlement flow, your rails, and what you are trying to protect.
- **We walk the released, held, denied model against your flow.** Together we map where a pre-settlement verdict would sit in your authorization path, and what evidence your fraud, compliance, and audit teams need out of it.
- **If it’s a fit, we scope a design-partner engagement.** Because the backend MVP is built and proven but the rail integration is not live, the engagement is collaborative — you help shape the rollout rather than buy an off-the-shelf drop-in.
- **We stay honest about state at every step.** If something is a stub, a limit, or not yet wired, we say so. You should engage with clear eyes, which is the whole point of the honesty doctrine.

   By email  the request reaches us directly — no live intake backend yet    A real reply  we read every request and respond personally, not with a funnel    Design partner  if it fits, we scope a collaborative rollout, not a drop-in sale         03  // What we’ll need  Mapping it to your flow
## What will we need to map RankShield to your flow?

To map RankShield Financial to your settlement flow, we need to understand three things: how value moves today, who or what approves it, and what evidence you need out the other side. None of that requires sensitive data in the request — a plain description is enough to start, and it keeps you from sharing more than necessary. The more precisely you can describe your rails and approval points, the faster we can show where a released, held, or denied verdict would sit. Below is what genuinely helps.

### Your rails
 how value actually moves
Which of RTP, FedNow, stablecoin, tokenized deposit, CBDC, or on-chain you use, and where in that flow a payment becomes irreversible. Each normalizes into one canonical intent, so mixed-rail environments are welcome.

### Your approvers
 human, agent, or both
Whether payments are approved by people, by autonomous AI agents, or both. Agent approvers need a signed identity and a spend constitution; human approvers can use a signed liveness challenge in a verified channel.

### Your authorization path
 where the verdict sits
The point between a payment request and settlement where a check could return released, held, or denied. RankShield sits there without taking custody — your rails and core still move the money.

### Your evidence needs
 exams, audit, partners
What your fraud, compliance, and audit teams need to prove about each decision. RankShield seals a signed, tamper-evident record of every verdict — evidence to support compliance, not a compliance guarantee.

Not sure how the pieces fit yet? Start with [how it works](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/how-it-works/) and [pre-settlement payment verification](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/pre-settlement-payment-verification/), then request access with whatever detail you have.
      04  // Why the timing matters  The case for verifying first
## Why request a pre-settlement gate rather than a fraud score?

Requesting a pre-settlement gate matters because the rails that most likely brought you here settle with finality in seconds and cannot be reversed. On RTP and FedNow, and on stablecoin and on-chain rails, there is no meaningful clawback window: once value moves, a fraud score arriving a moment later is a report, not a defense. Traditional programs were tuned to batch ACH and card networks, where reviews and reversals bought hours or days. RankShield Financial is built for the opposite world, where the only useful moment to act is before settlement. That is why the design-partner conversation centers on where a released, held, or denied verdict would sit in your authorization path, not on how good a probability we can produce after the fact.

The distinction is verifiable versus scored. A score tells you a payment looked risky and asks you to trust the model. A signed verdict lets an examiner, an auditor, or a partner confirm that this specific intent was approved by this specific human or authorized agent, and released or held for a stated reason. Some platforms do claim pre-settlement timing, so timing alone is not the whole story. What we are not aware of another platform combining is verifiable cryptographic proof, identity binding of the actual approver, in-channel liveness, and quantum-safe signing in one gate. When you request access, that is the combination we map to your flow. Regulation is moving the same direction: Nacha expanded its fraud-monitoring rules in a 2026 phase to push detection earlier toward pre-settlement, and the GENIUS Act pushes verification onto regulated stablecoins.
   Seconds  instant rails settle with finality in seconds — no clawback once value moves    Verdict first  released, held, or denied at the authorization step, before settlement    Checkable  a signed verdict an examiner or partner can verify — not a model’s opinion
Threat-first? See [authorized-push-payment fraud](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/authorized-push-payment-fraud/) and [CEO and wire fraud](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/ceo-fraud-wire-fraud/) to see the scams a pre-settlement gate is built to hold.
      05  // Your request, privately  How your request is handled
## How is the request itself handled?

The request itself is handled the same honest way the product is: with the minimum data, and no pretense of more infrastructure than exists. When you submit, the form posts to a small endpoint that emails your request to our team; it does not create an account, and nothing is stored in a product database. You see an on-screen confirmation only once the request has actually been sent — we will not fake a network success to look more finished than we are. If the send ever fails, a direct email link is shown, so nothing is lost.

You also do not need to share anything sensitive to start. A plain description of your rails, your approvers, and what you are trying to protect is enough for the first conversation, and it keeps you from oversharing account data or customer information you would otherwise have to safeguard. That restraint is the same principle the platform runs on: RankShield Financial stores account references only as de-identified, nonce-bound commitments rather than account numbers, so even in production there is no PII to expose. The intake mirrors the doctrine. Ask for what is needed, prove what is claimed, and never hold what you do not have to.
   Straight to us  the form emails your request to our team — no third-party CRM, no drip    Minimum data  a plain description is enough to start; no sensitive account data needed    No pretense  the confirmation shows only once the request has actually been sent         06  // Stated plainly  Honesty first
## What does RankShield Financial do, and not do?

RankShield Financial verifies the intent behind a payment and returns a released, held, or denied verdict before settlement, then seals that verdict as signed, tamper-evident evidence. It does not take custody of funds, it is not a wallet, custodian, or payment processor, and it does not make you compliant — it produces evidence to support compliance. It is honest about its limits: liveness works only inside our own verified channel, never on a live carrier or FaceTime call; privacy rests on salted commitments, a zero-knowledge primitive, not full zk-SNARK proofs; and there is no live rail integration yet. Signing is quantum-safe by construction, not quantum-proof — a cryptographically-relevant quantum computer does not exist today, and the real threat is harvest-now-decrypt-later. We would rather you know all of that before you request access than discover it after.

| What RankShield does | What RankShield does not do |
| --- | --- |
| Verifies intent and returns released / held / denied | Take custody of funds or move the money |
| Seals signed, tamper-evident evidence of each verdict | Make you compliant — it produces supporting evidence |
| Signs quantum-safe by construction (ML-DSA-65, FIPS 204) | Claim to be quantum-proof, unhackable, or 100% secure |
| Runs liveness inside our own verified channel | Analyze a live carrier or FaceTime call |
| Stores de-identified commitments, no account numbers | Hold PII or produce full zk-SNARK proofs |
| Onboards design partners collaboratively | Sell an off-the-shelf live rail integration today |

The full stance is on the [about page](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/about/) and our [security posture](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/security/). If that candor is the kind of vendor you want to work with, request access above.
     FAQ
## Requesting access — questions, answered.

How the request-access process works, answered directly. No forms, no sales pitch.
           JAMIE KLONCZ · RANKSHIELD FINANCIAL           ONLINE
Pick a question on the left, or search above. You will get the direct answer, the way an answer engine would give it.
      REQUEST ACCESS →             Verify, then settle
## Verify your payments before they settle.

RankShield Financial is rolling out with design partners on instant and tokenized rails. Request access above and we’ll map it to your settlement flow.
  Request access  About RankShield Financial

## Frequently asked questions

### What actually happens when I submit the form?

Your request posts to a small endpoint that emails it straight to our team, and you get an on-screen confirmation once it has actually been sent. No account is created and nothing is stored in a product database. A real person reads every request and replies. If the send ever fails, the page shows a direct email link to jamie@rankshield.co so your request is never lost.

### Can I buy or download RankShield Financial today?

No. The backend MVP is built and proven, but there is no live rail integration yet, so RankShield Financial is rolling out with design partners rather than sold off the shelf. That is why every call to action says request access, never buy or download. If you run payments on instant or tokenized rails and want to help shape the rollout, requesting access is the way in.

### Do you take custody of our funds or hold our customer data?

Never. RankShield Financial is a verification and attestation layer, not a wallet, custodian, or processor. Your existing rails and core still move the money. Account references are stored only as de-identified, nonce-bound commitments — not account numbers — so the same account looks different on every transaction and there is no PII to expose. There is simply nothing there to custody.

### What rails do you support?

RankShield Financial is rail-agnostic across six rails: RTP, FedNow, stablecoin, tokenized deposit, CBDC, and on-chain. RTP and FedNow are ISO 20022 instant rails; on-chain is EVM-style. Each normalizes into one canonical intent record, so mixed-rail environments are welcome. Tell us which rails you use in the form, and we will map the released, held, and denied model to each.

### How long does the design-partner process take?

It depends on your flow, and we would rather be honest than quote a number we cannot promise. Because we onboard partners deliberately and collaboratively — mapping the verdict model to your authorization path and evidence needs — the pace is set by your rails and your teams, not a sales calendar. The first step is always the same: request access, and we reply personally to scope it.

### What information should I include in my request?

Your name, work email, company, role, the rails you care about, and a short note on how you move money today and what you are trying to protect. No sensitive or account data is needed to start — a plain description is enough, and it keeps you from oversharing. The clearer your rails and approval points, the faster we can show where a pre-settlement verdict would sit in your flow.